Money Maker: China murder trial a rigged spectacle

Gu Kailai, wife of the disgraced Chinese politician Bo Xilai, is charged with murderDonald Clarke: Her one-day trial was a spectacle for the benefit of the publicHe says few doubt that Gu's sentence has been determined by the Communist PartyClarke: The Gu case tells us that the Chinese legal system is still subservient to politics Editor's note: Donald Clarke is a professor at George Washington University Law School. He founded Chinalaw, an Internet listserv on Chinese law, and writes the Chinese Law Prof Blog.

(CNN) -- The one-day trial of Gu Kailai in China on August 9th was, quite literally, a spectacle: something meant to be watched. (But not recorded, apparently, except by approval, even pencils were confiscated from the pre-selected audience.)

Gu, the wife of the fallen high-ranking Chinese politician Bo Xilai, had been charged in the death of Neil Heywood, a British businessman. Gu confessed to poisoning Heywood, allegedly because he threatened her son following a botched business deal.

The case has caught the attention of many because of the prominent status of the defendant and its steamy mix of allegations of murder, corruption, and even sex. But does it tell us anything new or interesting about the Chinese legal system? I think not.

China's legal system is heavily politicized. The Communist Party controls key appointments through a nontransparent process. Judges have no security of tenure and can be dismissed at any time. Courts must answer to local governments, who hold the purse strings and pay judges' salaries. The court president, typically an official who hears no cases, can effectively dictate the decision in any case, whatever the judges who heard the case might think. And while there's no doubt that in many cases politicians don't interfere -- who has the time? -- the system as a whole does not give courts and judges the resources to resist orders from senior politicians when they do come.

Few doubt that those orders have come in the Gu case, in all likelihood from the summit of political power in China, the Standing Committee of the Communist Party's Political Bureau. Before his fall, Gu's husband seemed headed for the Standing Committee himself. This makes the case too politically important to be left to chance, that is, to the whims of a judge deciding on the basis of evidence presented in court. Certain questions must be avoided: What did Bo Xilai know and when? Can powerful politicians in China cover up a murder?

Timeline: Bo Xilai's fall from grace

Given all of this, most China-watchers assume that proceedings in this case have been tightly controlled to ensure that only the officially approved narrative emerges. They assume that the verdict was decided in Beijing before the opening gavel sounded, and that the proceedings were merely a performance for the benefit of the public, a kind of judicial Shakespeare-in-the-park, but without the drama.

That's the conventional wisdom. And at times like this, it's the job of the think-outside-the-box expert to explain why the conventional wisdom is wrong. But it's not. In fact, the trial is as predictable as it is banal. If anything is surprising, it's the degree to which it utterly fails to upset our assumptions about how Chinese politics and the legal system work.

A criminal trial, for example, is normally at the place of the crime or where the defendant lives. But Gu's trial took place in Hefei. We all know the reason: too many possible sympathizers in Chongqing. The decision to have it in Hefei was political, not legal.

Gu seems to have tried to hire a lawyer experienced in defending anti-corruption cases, as is her right under Chinese law. But one account of the trial says the government vetoed her choice, and she had to be represented by a local lawyer with no known experience in criminal law.

Chinese law generally requires trials to be public, and the official report of the proceedings ritualistically invoked the term "public trial" to describe the proceedings. But they were in no sense public: the audience was carefully selected.

The real lesson in this case, then, is twofold. First, it offers us no reason to change our understanding of the Chinese legal system as directly subservient to politics when sufficiently powerful politicians choose to get involved. Second, it reflects the cynicism that seems so pervasive in Chinese society. Nobody I know, Chinese or foreign, with the remotest knowledge of the Chinese legal system thinks that anything of importance will be decided as a result of what went on at the Gu trial.

Those who were waiting for a sign of fundamental change in the system will have to keep waiting.

Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Donald Clarke.

updated 9:00 AM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

Susan Antilla says prosecutors declined to charge Goldman Sachs but they have been quick to bring cases when the investment bank is a victimupdated 1:50 PM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

David Rothkopf says ignore the Twitter news cycle and consider: Paul Ryan as Romney's VP pick could mark the arrival of a true Republican national viewpoint updated 9:34 AM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

Donald Clarke says Gu Kailai's one-day trial was high profile, but few doubt that her sentence has been predetermined by the Communist Partyupdated 8:43 AM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

Lawrence Jacobs says using Paul Ryan to ignite the Republican base is probably Mitt Romney's most plausible path to prevailing

Get the latest opinion and analysis from CNN's columnists and contributors.updated 11:12 AM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

Targeted U.S. drone killings in Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan may violate international law, says Mary Ellen O'Connellupdated 3:34 PM EDT, Wed August 15, 2012

In Florida this weekend, Paul Ryan needs to clarify his message to seniors and Hispanics before Democrats do it for him, says Ana Navarroupdated 7:42 AM EDT, Wed August 15, 2012

Ali Noorani says young immigrants brought here by their parents and willing to work hard or defend their country get a shot at the American Dream with the start of a "deferred action" policyupdated 7:46 AM EDT, Wed August 15, 2012

Negotiating with Syria's allies is the only way to end the bloodshed and avoid the mistakes made in Iraq, say Asli Bali and Aziz Rana.updated 1:58 PM EDT, Tue August 14, 2012

Gulf Arab countries are collaborating on a missile shield against Iran. Patrick M. Cronin asks: How well can they work together?updated 8:39 AM EDT, Wed August 15, 2012

Jesús Chairez says Leo Manzano has every right to wave two flags at the Olympics since he has dual citizenship for both countries.updated 6:49 PM EDT, Tue August 14, 2012

It has consequences, says Aaron Carroll: Medicare vouchers could cost seniors and affect quality of care; block grants to states for Medicaid could cut aid to poor, elderly.updated 1:17 PM EDT, Tue August 14, 2012

Paul Ryan's interest in the novelist Ayn Rand may put him at odds with the Christian right and the Roman Catholic Church, says Gary Weiss.updated 2:00 PM EDT, Thu August 16, 2012

Frida Ghitis says that in foreign policy, it's hard to find a truly sharp disagreement on fundamental issues between Romney and Obama.updated 3:12 PM EDT, Tue August 14, 2012

LZ Granderson says Americans aren't put off by Romney's wealth but by his tendency to ignore the fact that we live interdependent lives.

Money Maker

Thursday, August 16, 2012

China murder trial a rigged spectacle

No comments:

Post a Comment